<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Books. Been immersing myself in</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sumption.org/2002/02/01/books-been-immersing-myself-in/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sumption.org/2002/02/01/books-been-immersing-myself-in/</link>
	<description>Book and film reviews, stuff about photography, geekery, plus Dan Sumption's adventures in Sheffield and London.</description>
	<pubDate>Tue,  6 Jan 2009 01:21:37 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dan Sumption</title>
		<link>http://www.sumption.org/2002/02/01/books-been-immersing-myself-in/comment-page-1/#comment-24</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Sumption</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2003 08:05:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sumption.org/wordpress/?p=236#comment-24</guid>
		<description>Gurtrude, that's wonderful, I think. Care to define "prenumptional inargruay" for me?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gurtrude, that&#8217;s wonderful, I think. Care to define &#8220;prenumptional inargruay&#8221; for me?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gurtrude</title>
		<link>http://www.sumption.org/2002/02/01/books-been-immersing-myself-in/comment-page-1/#comment-23</link>
		<dc:creator>Gurtrude</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2003 03:11:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sumption.org/wordpress/?p=236#comment-23</guid>
		<description>I really indeed understand the philosophical works and in miscellaneous consumption, I nevertheless regard o such prenumptional inargruay. In yet, to death we become confused, instataneously, and uncalled for I think this was such a provocative and crisp, rich enfullment on prognosis assumptional capote.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really indeed understand the philosophical works and in miscellaneous consumption, I nevertheless regard o such prenumptional inargruay. In yet, to death we become confused, instataneously, and uncalled for I think this was such a provocative and crisp, rich enfullment on prognosis assumptional capote.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
