Archive for January, 2006

Snapfish

I just got some photos back from Snapfish - horrible, yeuch, bleached-out things. I have to say I wasn’t expecting miracles, given that it is really a snapshot service and the help files have very little to say about how to get best results from the service (they even say, albeit accidentally, that the optimum size for a 7″ x 5″ print is 393×550 pixels!!!), but I am surprised that the results are worse than I would expect from my own inkjet printer. Given that HP are a company primarily known for their printers, this is possibly not a good diversification choice for them.

Conversely, I’ve been very surprised with the quality of from-digital prints I have got from Jessops - the results are incredibly professional looking, given that they’re essentially just offering a high-street photo service. I have a coupon for some money off Boots printing, so will see what they’re like soon, but as with Snapfish I’m not expecting anything revolutionary.

And for the time being at least, anything I want to look seriously professional goes to Peak Imaging. I’m going to try out some of my Magna neon light shoots on their metallic paper soon - look forward to that!

Photoshop Learning Curves

For the last month or so, I’ve been devouring Dan Margulis books, firstly Photoshop Lab Color: The Canyon Conundrum and Other Adventures in the Most Powerful Colorspace and now Professional Photoshop: The Classic Guide to Color Correction - 4th Edition. The guy writes like an angel. I can count on the fingers of one hand the number of computer books I have read which have been so compelling they’re hard to put down, and these are two of them. And as I’ve read, my understanding of Photoshop (and colour, and printing, and half-a-dozen other related topics) has skyrocketed.

For a couple of years now I’ve been wanting to get to grips with the levels command, not understanding exactly what it represents and how I can use it to improve my pictures rather than ruin them. Margulis poo-poos this rather blunt instrument and dives straight in to doing everything with curves, something I’d been even more terrified of (so much so I only had to look at the curves dialog box and I’d break into a cold sweat). Well, I’m not quite there yet with curves (my theory is running far ahead of my practice) but at least I now know what they do, how they can (in theory at least) be put to good use, and I can knock together some only slightly hamfisted curves of my own.

I’ve also learnt plenty of thing I never knew existed or were important: more LAB colour voodoo than you could shake a skull-topped stick at, what GCR and UCR are and why I need to know, how to tame the Unsharp Mask filter, how to (and why to) correct colour by numbers rather than visually, plus a million different blending tricks. And it feels like the journey is just beginning.

Browsing through some old images, I came across my “snowball” photo from Todmorden, taken just under a year ago. It looked like a challenging picture to play with, so I did. I’m fairly pleased with the results, although there’s a couple of parts I’m not sure about (and it’s a real bugger to find the right unsharp mask to use on it). Anyway, here’s three versions, I’ll not say what they represent but I’d be interested to hear which you like most/middle/least and, if possible, any comments you have on them. I’ll publish further details of each in a few days.

Return of the Bandwidth Thieves

After my little rant about image/bandwidth thieves, I found this myspace page, this one and this one also feature my babies image. I updated the replacement picture - this one should screw nicely with anybody’s page layout :->

Afterthought: why dead babies? Why is everyone so obsessed with dead babies. Why don’t they steal my images of, for example, the giant Japanese spider crab?

Addendum: and this one, this one, this one, this one, this one and this one. This one had even stolen my new, moved baby image.

Addendum 2: and here.

Devo 2.0

Whoah! Devo de-evolved into a kids band - how cool is that? And backed by… Disney? Cartoon Network would make more sense, what with Mark Mothersbaugh writing the music for Rug Rats and the like (but then, he did Herbie Fully Loaded too so… the Disney link makes sense). Anyway, check out the video for Uncontrollable Urge, it rocks.

From the Club Devo website:

DEV2.0 is a strange, Corporate-Feudal experiment that attempts to bring the original DEVO music sensibility to children in the 5 to 8 year old demographic range. READ MORE

Cardiacs photos

New (old) photos! Cardiacs playing the Bull & Gate! Enjoy!

Image Theft

Today I had a quick trawl through my website usage statistics, as I like to do once every blue moon or so. I was surprised to see a couple of non-search engine sites listed under referrers. Usually I get almost all of my traffic from Google, so my interest piqued I headed over to see who was linking to me.

It turned out, nobody was linking to me - at least not to the pages on my site. Instead, people were stealing my images.

I know that Phil used to (and no doubt still does) suffer from this a lot, in particular people are forever ripping off his justly famous photographs of Frank Zappa. I understood Phil’s ire over this theft, after all his photographs are how he makes his living. I even helped him customise a “bandits” perl script to serve up a surprise to anyone stealing bandwidth and images from Phil’s site. But for myself I never really saw small acts of image theft from my site, mainly by kids, as a problem. This was partly because I didn’t feel I had very much worth stealing, and partly because, compared to the hundreds of people who have stolen Phil’s Zappa pics, the scale of borrowings from my own site is so small as to be hardly worth worrying about.

But this time I found myself increasingly annoyed by the rudeness of people pinching both my images and my bandwidth. One image in particular seems to be particularly popular - from my Dead Baby photos which I mentioned recently and which are still by far the biggest draw to my site from search engines.

First I found that somebody calling themselves “JessFlick” had posted the second baby picture (a direct link to it on my site, rather than a repost) on a forum here. Ironically, on the next page was a picture of Frank Zappa… not yawning but picking his nose. I spotted that JessFlick had even started using my picture (again direct linked, not even resized) as her own avatar on the board.

Something like that is easy and fun to revenge. I renamed my baby picture and uploaded a new version over the original, with a personalised message to JessFlick.

Then, looking further through the referers, I came across this abortion of a webpage. Ignoring the fact that it’s one of the ugliest things I’ve ever seen on the web, the background was a wallpaper of messages to JessFlick - so obviously it had been a wallpaper of (my) dead babies until a few minutes before. The gratification of screwing up this webpage (if it’s possibly to screw up something already so ugly) was added to slightly by the fact that most of the comments left on that page say things like “i love it especially the dolls” and “I love your background!” Well, at least it was gratifying for a few seconds until I realised that people saying these things actually liked that webpage.

Obviously it’s not fair to pick on children, and JessFlick and FingerTheDoughboy clearly are both children, but god I enjoy it.

JessFlick and Doughboy, if you want your dead baby pictures back please leave a comment here or email me and I’ll be happy to supply you with your own personalised versions. Anyone else who wants to steal directly from my website, karma police’ll get you in the end.

Update: less than 24 hours later, and both Jess and the Doughboy have moved on, stolen their images from somewhere new.

Shatner!

Thanks to Scot for pointing out another opportunity to see William Shatner making an ironically pre-ironic fool of himself.

Lifeless on Livejournal

Naomi very kindly set up a syndicated feed of Life Less Literary on Live Journal. Perhaps this will mean more LJers visiting my site. Perhaps not.

Too Many Dans!

How weird is this? After my recent rant about iPhoto and subsequent experiments with iView MediaPro, Niina mails me to tell me that both Dan and Dan, as well as Dan (me), have recently blogged about switching to iView after problems with iPhoto. This could mean one of several things:

  1. iView have a brainwave transmitter set up on the dark side of the moon which is brainwashing all Dans to dump iPhoto in favour of their product.
  2. iPhoto is so appallingly rubbish that there is a mass exodus away from it and towards iView.
  3. Almost every Australian male of a certain age (plus this English one) is called Dan.
  4. …insert reason here.

Kids on the Street

Teenagers on the street, Sheffield

I forgot to include this picture with the batch of street photos I just uploaded. I took it the following day, in the centre of Sheffield. I was going shopping with Rowan and Lola. As soon as I’d taken it, Rowan ordered me to put my camera away, otherwise she wasn’t going to walk any further with me. Nice to see I’m not the only one embarassed by street photography :)