Archive for January, 2006

Street Photography 2 - What a Difference a Day Makes

Wednesday, January 18th, 2006

After writing last week about my pathetic attempts at street photography, things moved very fast. In fact the next day, everything changed.

The day I wrote that blog entry, I had walked past the University and thought “if only there was a graduation ceremony going on, then it would be easy to photograph people”. Well, the next day I walked past there and, lo and behold, loads of mainly Chinese/Malaysian/Korean students dressed in black gowns and mortar boards. As I was approaching, one lone student saw my camera and asked me to take a picture of him. Another group of students across the road asked me to do the same. I photographed them all with their own cameras and then with mine. And it was downhill skiing all the way from there. I’m still a long way off being able to approach people easily, but I’m over that first, hardest hurdle, and moving forward a lot quicker than I’d expected.

I also experimented a little with my approach. Soon discovered that, as I’d already been told, wrapping the camera strap around my wrist made it a lot easier to shoot, and felt a lot more “right”, than dangling it around my neck (didn’t half make my wrist ache though). Abandoned fully manual settings for shutter-priority exposure metering (re-evaluated whenever the light changed) and single-point focus (because actually I can set up an auto-focus point on my EOS-20D a lot faster than I’d realised, and my attempts at leaving the camera at hyperfocal distance didn’t work too well, mainly because I wasn’t getting as close to my subjects as I’d anticipated).

I even had my first confrontation - from a policeman who told me I should ask for permission before taking his photo. Feeling slightly cocky, I pointed out that there was a big CCTV camera behind him which didn’t ask for anybody’s permission before taking their pictures, but this didn’t go down too well! Good thing I didn’t say “I’m from the Stockwell school of photography - shoot first, ask questions later” as I’m sure my camera would have disappeared faster than you could say “suspected terrorist”. As it was, he kept me hanging around, asking me lots of uneccesary questions. Eventually I just apologised quickly & did a runner while he was talking into his radio.

I’ve uploaded the results of my day’s shooting - no killer pics there, but not too bad for a first attempt. Onwards and upwards…

Tuileries Fairground Tiger-Ride

Wednesday, January 18th, 2006
Dan, Rowan and Jessie in the Tuileries

I found this picture during a recent clear-out, thought I’d better scan and upload it before it fades away to nothingness.

What it Means to be British

Tuesday, January 17th, 2006

According to Protein, this comes from a discussion started off by one of our newspapers, but a quick Google reveals that it may be more widespread. Anyway…

“Being British is about driving in a German car to an Irish pub for a Belgian beer, and then travelling home, grabbing an Indian curry or a Turkish kebab on the way, to sit on Swedish furniture and watch American shows on a Japanese TV. And the most British thing of all? Suspicion of anything foreign.”

(after all that, is it any wonder we’re suspicious ;))

New Private View Photos

Sunday, January 15th, 2006

I’ve uploaded my latest set of photos - not to my life page, for a change, but to Flickr. I’ve had this Flickr account for a while, but only ever uploaded one thing to it, because I like to keep a bit more control over my photos. I’m tempted to play around with Flickr a bit more though, as it seems to have become much more fully featured since I last looked at it. But for now, I mainly stuck them there so that I could easily add them to the FAD Blog.

So, please check out my new pics, whether you do so via the FAD Blog or via my Flickr page. I think they include some of my best photos yet, although they are a bit noisy as most were taken at 1600 ISO.

Nggggg!

Friday, January 13th, 2006

Aaargh! I fucking HATE iPhoto!

I wouldn’t really use it, but it’s just there on my Mac, which is nowadays my only portable computer, and hence the one I use to download photos onto when I’m on the move. And it least it lets me import the pictures and run a quick slide show to see what they look like (albeit one that moves around annoyingly so I can never see the full images).

All well and good, until I decide to do something with it. As with almost all Mac software, and increasingly PC software too, iPhoto likes to protect you from the messy stuff going on behind the scenes. So I’ve had to drill through the hard disk to find out where it actually puts my pictures: in subdirectories of subdirectories of subdirectories, somewhere a couple of miles beneath my “pictures” folder. So far so good. Again rather annoyingly the pictures are stored in individual folders for each day, so I have to keep drilling down and back up again. And when I reach my destination, all of the images are JPEGs. No sign of my camera RAW files, until I drill one step further down into “originals”. Thank goodness, there they are.

So I copy all of the files from “originals” over to my PC hard disk. Then I do it for the “originals” folder from the next day. As I am doing so, I am also copying more stuff to the Mac. My hard disk is getting dangerously full. So I delete all the images from one folder up, because they’re just JPEGs converted by iPhoto, right?

Moving to the PC, I find I have lots of JPEGs mixed in with my RAW files, duplicates. Gradually I spot a pattern emerging. All of the RAW files which were taken in portrait have an accompanying JPEG. Then there are some more JPEGs, which were the images I took on my second memory card: I changed the settings to JPEG, because I was rapidly running out of space for photos. Gradually as I go through them all, I realise some pictures are missing. I still have the thumbnails in iPhoto, though not the full-sized images as I have since deleted all of these. Then it dawns on me, all of the missing images are landscape photos taken in JPEG mode.

And that’s it. They’re gone for good. Deleted by my own hastiness, and Apple’s appalingly structured file-system. So, to summarise, in iPhoto the folder called “originals” does not contain copies of all your originals, as I had assumed. If your file is a landscape RAW, it will contain that file. If it is a portrait RAW, it will contain that file plus a rotated JPEG copy. If it is a portrait JPEG, the folder will contain a rotated JPEG copy. And if it is a landscape JPEG, it’s skipped and goes straight to the top-level folder. Which also contains copies of all of the other variations. In summary, each picture is stored between one and three times, in varying locations. Why? I had always assumed that the quintillions of hidden files you get when copying Mac files to a PC contained some sort of metadata, surely it wouldn’t be too hard to add to that metadata a little something about whether an image should be rotated (as Photoshop on the PC does, and many other programs) rather than having to make up to two additional copies of the file?

Mood: furious. And depressed. All of my best photos from last night were, of course, landscape JPEGs. But then, I would say that. It’s the ones that got away.

Street Photography

Wednesday, January 11th, 2006

I went out and “attempted” some street photography today. This is something that’s been on my mind a long time: at least a couple of years, but increasingly so these last couple of months. It’s been gnawing at my mind, really getting at me.

My reasoning goes something like this: I want to take photos of people, they are the most interesting types of photo, the most appealing, because humans are the things which appeal most to other humans. I’ve had some limited success taking pictures of my own family, but cute though Rowan and Lola are, there’s only so many outfits/expressions/situations I’m likely to catch them in, and eventually things get a little tired. So I would really like to expand my “people pool”, get photos of some other human beings.
Also, of course, street photography makes one look around, try to be continually aware, and that’s something I’m very keen to cultivate.

But I’ve never quite understood street photography is “done”, how one deals with one’s subjects without pissing them off, how one captures a natural pose. I could see two possibilities: either go up to people in the street, ask to take photos of them, then take the photos; or sneakily take a shot without asking, ideally without even being seen. I now know that both are commonly used strategies.

So, last week when I was in London I determined to follow the less intrusive of route of asking people to pose for me, perhaps present them with one of my new business cards to reassure them. Ha! Some chance! I chickened out, didn’t speak to a single soul, got back to Sheffield feeling very lonely (and then nearly got my camera nicked, but that’s another story).

This is Har(d)Court
Today, after steeling myself by reading a few tales from various street photography sites, I set out again (Juan Buhler’s street photography tips really helped, as did John Brownlow’s).

Once again, my haul was pathetic. About the only thing half worth keeping was the image on the right, a clip from a much larger snapshot which I like to call “This is Harcourt” and is really more “through the window photography” than street photography. But as for confronting people, one-on-one, sticking that wide-angle lens right in their face and snapping away uninvited: no chance.
I bottled out every time. And ended up psychoanalysing myself, probably far more than necessary but what the hell.

A while back, when I was seeing a counsellor, I said that I often felt shy and unable to bring myself to do things. She asked for an example, and I said that I couldn’t got up to people in the street and photograph them. She looked at me as if I were slightly mad, which for somebody whose job is to make me out as being less mad than I feel is not a good look, and told me that she was sure very few people would have the courage to do such a thing, and she wasn’t even sure that it was an ethical thing to do anyway. Well, of course she was more-or-less right, and it was a bad example for me to choose, but I still feel that this is part of a problem I suffer from more than most. I think it has to do with a fear of rejection, or of being challenged and finding myself unable to provide an adequate account. I know that the majority of people probably feel similarly, but I do think that it’s stronger in me than in most, but that I have a willpower which just occasionally, when my need to do something is overwhelming, manages to overcome it. It’s this “shyness” (to describe it using far too simple a term) which means that I have only once in my life found the courage to ask a girl out, even though I knew that many other times I could do so without any real risk to myself. It’s the knowledge that a tiny risk exists which prevents me from putting myself in the firing line. And for the same reason, I daren’t poke a camera in somebody’s face because I know that they have the right to object, even if they will rarely do so.

A second aspect of this: I think part of my fear, call it “the fear of the 1%”, arises from the fact that confronting other humans in this way does not lead to predictable outcomes. I’ve always been happiest working in fields where a discrete input leads to a discrete output: one reason I so enjoy working with computers is because, complex and infuriating though they often are, everything ultimately makes sense, everything depends upon rules. Human beings aren’t quite like that (or at the very least, they are like that but in infinitely more complex ways). I have never been entirely comfortable in social situations, never felt as if I have a good enough grasp of the “rules of the game”. I put this down to a type of borderline autism which I think affects a sizeable chunk of the male population. Despite years trying, learning, adapting, I still don’t feel entirely at ease dealing with living wetware.

I would feel happier doing street photography if I could, as John Brownlow says, “look like a pro, look like you’re meant to be there”. I don’t feel like a pro, I don’t feel like I’m meant to be there, I’m not confident enough of my own photographic skills, and I know that it shows.

Sooner or later I will overcome this barrier and start photographing strangers, and I think that it will have a greater effect on my personality, it will make me more confident and decisive in other areas too. Perhaps that is why I really feel this need to shoot pictures in more of a “risky” environment, not because I want the pictures but because I think the experience will make me a better person. For the meantime however, perhaps I should just aim a little lower?

Ponderosa Sunrise

Monday, January 2nd, 2006
Sunrise over Sheffield

Sunrise on Crookes Valley Road, Sheffield - The Ponderosa on the left, Sheffield University Arts Tower in the centre and Crookes Valley Park on the right.

Derek Bailey

Sunday, January 1st, 2006

During the usual festive retreat from reality, I managed to miss the news that Derek Bailey passed away on Christmas Day. He had, as they say, a good innings, but still this was one of those occasional “celebrity deaths” that really made me sit back and think. He is somebody who has gently guided my musical education from a distance, since I first saw him play at various “Company Weeks” in the early 90s, through his Channel 4 TV series about On The Edge: Improvisation in Music, to Incus Records and various recordings of his work (best when playing solo, despite his love for and cultivation of improvised conversations in groups of varying sizes), which require an almost meditative intensity to fully appreciate but which, on the few occasions I have managed to achieve such a state, come alive with incredible intelligence, wit and musicality. RIP.

(PS: Guy - one more Sheffield musician :))