5D Lust & Working Nights

The 30th November launch date for the Canon EOS 5D Mark ii is creeping closer, and my lust for it is growing. I’ve seen many, many posters commenting that Canon have “lost touch with what photographers want” with this new release - well, not what this photographer wants. It seems their main push has been to improve low light performance, and that’s exactly what I’ve been longing for. 25,600ISO doesn’t exactly look usable (though I’m sure I could coax something from it) but there are some amazing results at 3200ISO. Equally important for me, it’s full-frame, which means my 24mm f/1.4L comes into its own and I can finally produce some decent ultra-wide shots in next-to-zero light.

This is all academic at the moment. Although the lowest UK price has dropped some £500 over the last month I’m still not going to have the money for one of these for a while yet. But I will get one, I’m determined to.

However, just thinking about the camera has got me excited. After reading a John Berger essay on Paul Strand in Berger’s About Looking, I’m tempted to try some straight documentary portraiture. And what better than to combine the 5Dii’s low light performance, my own preferred working methods, and a straight reading of the title of my recent photo-book Working Nights (which I don’t think I’ve blogged about yet… life’s been getting ahead of me these past 6 months). So I think I will do some portraiture of people who work 9-5 - that is, 9pm to 5am, or at some time during those hours. Minicab drivers, security guards, cleaners, fluffers (the London Underground type, although I suppose possibly also the other type), 24-hour shop workers, kebab-house owners…

I like this idea.

Reasons to be Cheerful

[Some thoughts on the election of Barack Obama, edited from my post on the Empty Space message board]

…Although there are reasons to be concerned, and the Obama presidency can’t possibly live up to all that’s expected of it, I think there are more reasons for optimism than for pessimism.

I keep looking back to the 1997 Labour landslide (to the tune of “Won’t get fooled again”), but I think there are important differences. Obama seems more intellectually curious than Blair, and more of a pragmatic realist than Mr. “no reverse gear” (though of course it’s hard to gauge these things until the policy-making gets underway). Crucially, Obama has been elected at a time when America is at its lowest point in over 50 years, whereas Blair came to power when the economy was already climbing and everyone was talking about “cool Brittania” ruling the waves. Blair squandered opportunities because he was too scared of upsetting the gravy train, too worried about losing his grip on power. Obama has a far greater opportunity for making radical changes, if only because he has less to lose.

It’d be foolish to expect overnight miracles, but there have been some very interesting and positive signs since the election result. The most obvious thing to me was the return of loud American accents to London - signs of a people coming out of hiding, no longer ashamed. I also detected a new sense of pride in black people I saw, whether friends & colleagues, strangers serving me in shops, or just kids hanging out around the housing estates of White City (now there’s an ironic name). There also (though I could be imagining it) seemed to be a greater two-way respect, and a greater willingness to communicate between white & black. And I think this is echoed throughout the world, with countries from France to Iran happy to praise Americans for their choice of president.

I’m not someone who believes in seismic overnight changes in public opinion and behaviour. Generally, I think that the mood of society changes at atomic level, and it’s only over years, decades, even centuries that we can spot big changes. For example, same-sex relationships have become increasing accepted over the last 20 years, but it’s hard to think of any particular day when everyone woke up and said “you know what? Gay people are OK really”. In science, it’s said that you have to wait for a generation of scientists to die before any radical new theory can take hold. I don’t think that Obama’s election suddently makes the world an OK place, but I do think that it’s accelerated the changes which are very gradually breaking down racial prejudices across much of the world, and it bodes well for future generations (should we manage to keep the world in one piece for them…)

Hunger by Steve McQueen

My earliest vivid memory of a TV news report was one on the dirty protests at Northern Ireland’s Maze prison. Some earlier events left vague memories - Thatcher’s election as Conservative leader, the rescue of the US hostages from Iran, the Winter of Discontent - but those shit-covered H-Block walls and the hosepipes spraying them down are still clear in my mind as if I’d seen them yesterday.

So tonight I went to see Steve McQueen’s film Hunger:

The walls were there, exactly as I remember them. The film’s visual impact - scrub that, the film’s impact - is enormous. I left the cinema three hours ago and have been in some sort of a daze ever since. McQueen has a very minimal but very powerful way of telling a story - for most of the film, there is little dialogue, just a stark succession of images (and sounds) which tell it like words never could. But sandwiched in the middle of all of this visual drama is a single-take static-camera sequence of some 20 minutes in which soon-to-be hunger-striker Bobby Sands explains his intentions to a catholic priest. It’s the most uncomfortable part of a very uncomfortable film, and it kept the audience glued to the screen.

Hunger is a beautiful, disturbing, mind-opening symphony in shit, piss and blood, and it fuels my rapidly developing admiration for Steve McQueen. Check out this interview with Mark Kermode for BBC’s Culture Show, which talks about Hunger and also his work as official war artist in Iraq.

The Elegance of the Hedgehog by Muriel Barbery

The elegance of the hedgehog is a rather beautiful, if flawed, novel which seems to have been dragged down to earth by a rushed and often over-literal translation.

The book is narrated by Renée, a lowly concierge with secret highbrow tastes, and features interludes from the diary of Paloma, a precocious twelve year-old who is so appalled by the grown-up world around her that she plans to commit suicide on her thirteenth birthday. For most of the first half of the book these two characters are so relentlessly miserable and misanthropic that, had I not been reviewing the book for Amazon, I would have given up long before the halfway point. However, as becomes increasingly clear, the author is setting the scene for a moral lesson, and by the end both characters have learned that you shouldn’t judge by appearances, and that it is better to help others than to sit at home moaning about them. From halfway, the book really picks up pace, and by the end… well, it’s all rather special.

However, the author doesn’t seem to entirely believe her own teachings. One of the key themes of the book is not to judge people by their appearance or social status, and yet even the most sympathetic characters in the book seem to be completely taken aback at the mere idea of “a concierge who reads”. Also, there is no redemption for most of the upper-class, snobbish and utterly unlikeable residents of Renée’s apartment block: in fact, read differently the lesson of this novel could just as well be “all rich French people are bad, and all foreigners are good (and exotically mysterious to boot!)”

Several existing reviews of the book use the word “philosophical”, perhaps inspired by Paloma’s “profound thoughts”. Most of these are written in a philosophical way, but aren’t that different from the type of musings-on-the-world which you would expect to find in the diary of many intelligent teenagers. Similarly, Proust is mentioned in a couple of reviews, but the only link I could find is a couple of references to madelines, and the use of other items (jasmine tea, camellias, …) as a similar trigger for memories.

It’s not always easy to get to the real meaning of the novel, however, as the translation is often stodgy and unsatisfactory. This is most noticable in the translation of colloquialisms, dialect and grammatical oddities: in particular, a key element of the story is that both main characters hate bad grammar; but the errors they choose to vent their fury upon are, in the English translation, so minor as to be imperceptible to all but the most strictly schooled English speakers. The subsequent outrage makes both characters seem like frothing grammar-nazis of the worst order, and for me at least this made me unable to take the characters seriously.

Throughought the book (although mainly in the first half) I stumbled across awkward sentences which, I guessed, had been too literally translated from the French. This was a huge distraction and greatly spoiled my enjoyment of the book. But if you can fight your way through these then there is a decent reward by the end.

Buy this book at Amazon UK

He Died with his Eyes Open, by Derek Raymond

He Died with His Eyes Open (Factory 1) is a stunning, shocking novel which manages to transcend the genre of crime fiction in a similar way that, for example, James Ellroy and Raymond Chandler do. I rate Raymond above either Ellroy or Chandler though: his books, like the very best of literature, hold the reader’s attention throughout but continue to provoke thoughts and questions long after you have finished reading.

The book’s narrator is an un-named policeman from “The Factory”, investigating the brutal death of an alcholic writer. While listening to the writer’s diary-like collection of cassette tapes, the policeman finds himself questioning his own life, and increasingly empathising with this intellectual slummer who was uncommonly charitable and yet despised by many of those he came into contact with. By the end of the book, the taped monologues started to affect me, the reader, in a similar way.

There are also some absolutely wonderfully constructed word-portraits in here. It’s almost worth the price of the book just for the single paragraph where Raymond imagines the possible future trajectory of a junkie’s life, through a sort of forced redemption to a dismal yet insignificant conclusion.

Click here to buy this book from Amazon UK.

Clean Code by Robert C Martin et al

Clean Code: A Handbook of Agile Software Craftsmanship, by “uncle” Bob Martin & his associates, is a great book, and one which any developer will learn a great deal from. In most respects, it is a five-star book, but… the title is misleading. By rights it should be called “Clean Java Code”.

Let me explain: I am an ActionScript developer, and bought this book to improve my code style and structure. For the most part, it has done that: the chapters on naming, comments, functions and classes are absolutely superb. But then, huge swathes of the book are devoted exclusively to Java, and use some fairly complex (and, in my opinion, not very well formatted) code to convey their intention.

I don’t generally have a problem with using Java-oriented books to learn more general programming concepts (Martin Fowler’s “Refactoring” and O’Reilly’s Head-First Design Patterns are both books I would recommend to anyone, regardless of their language-of-choice), but around 1/3rd of Bob Martin’s book is virtually impenetrable to anyone who does not already have significant Java experience.

That said, I should re-iterate that this book will be hugely valuable to any programmer. I just wish that they had tried to use a little more pseudo-code and a little less real-world examples, with all of the complexities entailed, and I think a lot could have been done to make the Java code more readable for users of other languages.

Click here to buy the book at Amazon UK.

All good…

I finally fixed my problem with blog comments (turns out the database was locked), and at the same time upgraded to the latest wordpress and tidied things up about around here.

Next step… re-install my funky K2K design, and then actually start writing posts again.

Meanwhile, you can always catch me on Twitter.

Circles of…

Melvin Bragg + intervention + 5pm->7om !===

Listened to Brahms (?) string sextett last night. Wow! Prehistoric ferns unfolding…

Blog Broke

For some reason, comments on this blog don’t seem to be working (and haven’t been for a while). I just upgraded the Wordpress software which runs the blog, but it doesn’t seem to have helped. Rather more major surgery is called for - which I don’t have time for at the moment. I will try to find the time over the next few weeks, but in the meantime if you want to get hold of me, just email me at the usual dan at sumption . org email address.

PS, yes, I do plan to post some more stuff here soon!

Fearne

Finally got to meet one of my heroes last night. This is what happened when she saw I was wearing a badge with her name on it:

Fearne Cotton

PS. wow - it’s been months since I posted. I keep meaning to write something long and rambling here, but I never get around to it when I’m actually in front of a computer.